tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6672242967645773383.post9008607509934704670..comments2024-01-30T16:19:28.235-08:00Comments on Philosophy on the move: Bart Nooteboomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09236480284983981285noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6672242967645773383.post-11030194988049867322013-01-18T03:24:11.447-08:002013-01-18T03:24:11.447-08:00Noud, You are right. As I said in my earlier blog ...Noud, You are right. As I said in my earlier blog on openness (item 72), it is not enough to say 'sorry', polish your image or advertise shining but vague, general intentions. That will mostly just deepen suspicion. They have to specify what went wrong, what THEY did wrong, how they propose to prevent such things in the future, give reliable reports on their progress, and let outsiders be the judge of that. Good luck with your credit card. Bart Nooteboomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09236480284983981285noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6672242967645773383.post-90835371311217403072013-01-15T22:09:08.568-08:002013-01-15T22:09:08.568-08:00Bart, thank you for this blog, investigating more ...Bart, thank you for this blog, investigating more on trust. What is troubling my mind is the situation at the moment. Some Dutch banks are trying to regain trust by a kind of PR action in advertisement blocks on television. But I think there is a great difference between changing their behavior and giving us the impression that they are changed and ready to help us. I think people feel the difference between real behavior and a PR strategy. As in overload of advertising of new food products it is hard to know what's a good product as a consumer. Often I get the feeling I am a walking credit card.Noudhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16624708137107250424noreply@blogger.com