404. From a new social conservatism to a new socialism
I have been wondering whether what I have been writing
in this blog adds up to a coherent political ideology. I have recently been
triggered in this by an article in the New York Review of Books (20 December
2018), by Mark Lilla on ‘Two roads for the new French right’. It brought into focus
the rise of Marion Maréchal, niece of Marine le Pen, with a deviation from the
latter’s National Front, with the contours of a more coherent, intriguing new
Christian social conservatism.
Here I summarize that account and then compare it to
my views, leading in a direction that is somewhat similar but also quite
different, amounting, I think, to a new form of socialism.
With populism on the right, as with Marine le Pen and
Donald Trump, this new conservatism shares nationalism and a rejection of
globalization, the EU, multiculturalism, and mass immigration. However, it does
accept multinational coordination, as long as it leaves national identities and
their variety intact.
It is against the EU for its globalized policies and
its neoliberal orientation towards the individualistic, egoistic homo economicus, its corresponding focus
on markets and its neglect of a social orientation, with iniquitous austerity
policies.
It harbours, along with a tradition of Christian
democracy, and with old-style American Christian ethics, the old, organic view
of humanity as communitarian and ‘organic’, and of family values, with a
traditional child-bearing role for women, rejecting same-sex marriage. The
catholic church has a long term tradition with communitarian values in convents
or monasteries, and the protestant church with local, voluntaristic
humanitarian projects.
With the green left this new conservatism shares its
sense of solidarity with the poor and neglected, as well as a commitment to
environmental ideals.
Where do I stand on all this?
With this social conservatism I share the
environmentalism and the social view of humanity, rather than the liberal view
of the autonomous individual, with, instead, a more organic communitarian view,
with a re-invigoration of local communities.
However, together with that I value diversity,
multiculturalism, not only between but also within nations. Also I do not wish
to return to old family strictures, and do not see why LGBT’ers could not also
flourish as members of local communities.
Also, I think that we need the EU for further
integration in the areas of foreign policy, defence, immigration, security and
financial policy (for equitable taxes, control of banking). However, and here I
agree with this social conservatism, we need a more social Europe. I think
awareness of this is growing in the EU. That includes less iniquitous austerity
policies for countries with failing finance, on the condition of effective,
equitable taxes, control of spending and corruption, but also a constraint on
lobbies of large firms that yield a race to the social bottom, and a moderation
of salaries and bonuses. The purpose, the mission, of business is to satisfy
needs in society. The most pressing need now is to save the environment.
Business is dragging its feet and thereby fails in its mission.
For this I have pleaded for a shift from utility
ethics to a virtue ethics, with the cardinal virtues of prudence, courage,
moderation and justice.
We cannot do without markets, but there are limits to
how far they should go, and there need to be measures against market
imperfections.
How, then, does my position compare with socialism? On
many points it is similar, except that socialism has let itself be side-tracked,
since the 1980’s, by neo liberalist ideology, and has become too individualist
and consumerist, neglecting social solidarity, community, and the environment.
It seems to me that if the new social conservatism develops, a coalition should be possible between that and a new socialism and Christian democracy, all sharing the social and environmental, and making compromises concerning the EU, on the condition of a revised, socio-economic orientation, replacing neo-liberalism, while preserving multiculturalism and immigration.
No comments:
Post a Comment