308. Resurrection of the political left
The political left has failed, as demonstrated, for
example, by a dramatic drop of votes in the recent election in the Netherlands.
This is no doubt due to its submission to neoclassical market ideology, with
deregulation, privatization, and austerity measures, as a misguided policy to
combat the economic crisis. The inequities that this generated, and a sense of
being betrayed, has bred the present populist anger and rebellion.
Now that the left has nothing left to lose, there is
not only a need but also room for a drastic re-orientation. Here is a proposal.
The central orientation that I propose is not to go
along with populism, as some liberal and conservative parties have begun to do
(e.g. in the Netherlands), pulled into the vortex of electoral pressure, giving
in to nationalist sentiments and demands for majority decision making (as in
referenda) that run the danger of violating the rule of law, with a tendency to
bypass the judiciary if needed, and have already produced such effects (e.g. in
Switserland).
The right way is not to abolish international trade,
break down the EU and hide in nationalism, and slide into dictatorships of the
majority. There is an alternative.
The challenge, I believe, is to take the wake-up call
of populism seriously, listen to its justified grievances, and produce
solutions. I propose three points for a new social vision.
First, save international trade, vital for prosperity,
in two ways. One: compensate those who lost out in globalization, with
programmes to bring new economic activity to areas of poverty, programmes for
re-schooling, and, if necessary, re-distribution of income. Two: block he
perversities of globalization, with multinational companies avoiding taxes,
benefiting from subsidies to lure them or prevent them from leaving, and
holding national governments hostage to the threat of leaving when not
accommodated.
Second, save the EU by transforming it from a union
only for the market to a union also for the people. The union is needed to
effect the measures indicated above, and to bundle clout for an effective
foreign policy, fiscal policy, policy for refugees, defence, environmental
protection, and economic position vis a vis the US and China. It can focus more
on such priorities and leave other things to the nations.
Third, save democracy by satisfying also the populist
demand for bringing citizens closer to politics, in a drastic decentralization
of government to local communities, in what is called the ‘commons’. The
underlying idea is that democracy should no longer be seen as a periodic
positioning, in electing a party with a pre-fabricated political programme, or
voting yes or no in a referendum. It should rather be seen as an ongoing
process, in which citizens participate in the identification of issues and the
development of policies. Use may be made of citizen councils, appointed at
random from a pool of he willing. The main role of a municipality would be to
facilitate and support that process.
Such decentralization and citizen initiative is
greatly facilitated by means of social media, and with local apps. Those media also
have worrying negative effects, but here they can help.
A political condition for such decentralization of
government is acceptance of some inequality between localities of services
offered. One cannot have more freedom of policy making without room for
diversity. However, a task of task of government that may remain, is to prevent
extremes of such inequality.