Sunday, April 10, 2016


256. Rest and restlessness

This is the last item in a series on time, duration, inspired by the work of Henri Bergson.

Is restlessness good, or not? Without restlessness there is no development and no creation. But according to the philosopher Schopenhauer we are driven by a restless will to satisfaction that is never achieved, and if we think we have achieved it, we experience insufferable boredom. We may be relieved from that race of craving, but only temporarily, by an aesthetic experience, a piece of Bach, say. For Schopenhauer a genius is able to escape from personality with its frenzied will, literally in ecstasy, stepping out of the self. So what is creation: restlessness or rest?

Ignaas Devisch[i] defines restlessness as an impassioned striving for what one considers meaningful. Here the positive is built into the definition. It implies voluntariness, not being dragged along in what one sees as senseless. That would not be restlessness but unrest. It yields negative stress. But passion also means suffering (as in the passion of Christ). The passion of creation can be painful. It gives stress, but in a positive sense. It can also be a surrender to a ‘flow’, an effortless transport, as if arising out of itself.

In the famous film Amadeus, about Mozart, there is a scene where Salieri, rival of Mozart, choking with envy, reads through a manuscript by Mozart in which there is no a single correction or strikeout, ‘as if God himself whispered it in his ear’.

Serendipity is the apparently unprepared and effortless reception of an illumination, as a strike of lightning, out of nothing. That is only apparent. It presents itself only to the prepared mind. The impression that it is as if there was no preceding thought or effort arises from the fact that much of our mental activity is subconscious, in ‘tacit’ knowledge. Much learning, doing and thinking breeds mental structures without one’s knowing about it, and those provide the capacity for sense making and receipt of an illumination.

But learning also requires rest and contemplation, a settling of the dust, relaxation of impulse. Uninterrupted change, without that, derails in neurosis, a directionless bounding from one hunch to another. I think in letting go also lies the importance of sleep: the mental digestion, sifting, and association of  impulses in the brain produced by the action of the day, to settle into stabilized circuits in the brain. Rest, release of control, surrender to that process, is also needed to allow for chance that generates the illumination. That is how dreams somehow yield nonsensical sense.

This is part, I think, of the more general principle, discussed also elsewhere in this blog, that development and invention require an alternation of stability and change, rest and restlessness, of assimilation and accommodation.      

In his early work on aesthetics of Nietzsche offered an opposition and combination of Apollo and Dionysus. Apollo is harmony, equilibrium, rest. Dionysus is orgy, the unrestrained, the destruction of equilibrium, creative destruction, restlessness. Nietzsche was inclined to the Dionysian, but recognized the need for the Apollonian.

People usually have more aptitude for the one or the other, and then the combination of the two requires collaboration or taking turns. In organizations we see that, for example, in the separation of a department of R&D and one of production. In development, exploration, less is fixed, there is more room for surprise, a wider scope, more faces in different directions. In production the perspective is tighter, more oriented to efficiency and fine-tuning, in exploitation of existing knowledge, skills and means.

Here one sees that combination or alternation of the two is needed also for economic reasons, but I think that applies also in the mental and bodily economy of personal development. Without stability there is no functioning for short term survival. Without change and development there arise stagnation and falling back. Another reason is epistemic: one needs to apply what exists in order to learn about its limitations and to gather elements for renewal, and gain inspiration for possible directions for it.      


[i] Ignaas Devisch, Restlessness, plea for a boundless life (in Flemish), De Bezige Bij, 2016.

No comments:

Post a Comment