220. Hosting the refugees
Attempts to host the host of refugees are rightly based on ideals of
hospitality and solidarity. But they should also be realistic and effective.
How to think about that?
To analyse this I use the multiple causality of Aristotle (see item 96
of this blog). I used that before, in an analysis of historical explanation
(item 100, on the emergence of the Dutch East India company), morality (item 175)
and power (item 213).
It works as follows. An artisan (efficient cause) makes furniture from
wood (material cause), according to a certain skill and technology of design
and production (formal cause), with the goal of earning and income, plus,
perhaps, the satisfaction of artisanal work and independence as an entrepreneur
(final cause), under certain enabling and constraining conditions of market,
regulation, … (conditional cause),
possibly following a certain model (exemplary cause).
Aristotle used that causality in his
attempt at natural science, but there it does not work. In particular, there is
no final causality. Objects moving in space do not tend towards some end. That
causality ended up on the dung heap of intellectual history, and was replaced
by a more mechanistic and singular causality of natural forces (with attempts
to arrive at a ‘unified theory’). The irony next is that economists emulated
such causality of elementary forces (of supply and demand), while in economy and
society Aristotle’s multiple causality, including final causality, fits
admirably.
The inclination to consider only some single factor is a (formal) cause
of much failure. Here one looks, for example, only at the goal, or who is to do
something, neglecting means, methods and circumstances, and the inspiration of
examples of success or failure.
In an analysis of a labour market, for example, one should consider what
workers it is about (efficient cause), what motivates them, with next to wage
also intrinsic value of work (final cause), what means are needed, such as
tools or machinery (material cause), what knowledge and skill (formal cause), under
what enabling and constraining conditions, such as child care, mobility, legal
regulations, unions, job security, possible discrimination, … (conditional
cause), and what models one might follow: Anglo-Saxon, ‘Rhineland’, or Scandinavian
(exemplary cause).
How would it work for dealing with the flood of refugees? We should look
at both sides of the relationship: the host country and the refugee.
For the host country it would work as follows. The efficient cause: in
helping refugees, who is to do what: national government, municipalities,
public agencies, schools, medical institutions, churches, Red Cross,
volunteers, ..? The final cause (intention) of help presumably is the ideal of charitability,
solidarity, hospitality. The material cause: financial means, available capacity
for housing, food, medical care, schooling, .. The formal cause: how to deal
with the logistics, organization, security, racial, religious, and cultural
differences? The conditional cause: acceptance and rejection by the population,
international relations, geo-political conditions. The exemplary cause: successful
approaches earlier, or elsewhere (as the flood from Nazi Germany, Eastern
Germany, former Yugo-Slavia, Hungary, …. )
For the refugee it would work out as follows. Who is the refugee; man, woman, child, family? What are their needs, aims and expectations: security, housing, work, income, support, …? What are their means: money, clothes, health, … What are their intellectual, social and cultural skills, knowledge, languages, religion, ability and willingness to integrate? What are the conditions for them: resources of housing etc. that are necessarily limited, cultural stance of the host country, degree of xenophobia, economic conditions, ….. Are there examples of successful integration of family or acquaintances?
All factors count. Germany at first focused on charitability and then
ran into problems with the other factors. Refugees had expectations that could
not be matched by limited resources available in the host country, in the short
time available to act. The weighing and matching of factors requires debate,
with involvement of those who are affected, or have relevant knowledge and
experience. Both sides are part of each other’s conditional cause.
Trust becomes fragile when expectations are disappointed. Therefore one
should not create too high expectations, being open about what one can and
cannot offer, taking all factors into account.
No comments:
Post a Comment