114.
Remedies?
Against loss
of contact with reality, in hyperreality, we can go against mere
opinion, emotion, hype and ecstasy and persist in demanding arguments and
facts, even if, admittedly, facts are never ‘rock bottom’ objective, never
identical to reality, and are mentally and socially construed. At least they
entail a commitment to grasp reality, even if that is imperfect. The
imperfection of our grasp entails the need for debate, for a contrast between
what you and I think we grasp. And we can step out of the virtuality of games
and make-believe, to combine experience with entertainment, action with
simulation, face with console.
Against
loss of individual identity, in hyperidentity, we can maintain variety,
utilize and revitalize cognitive distance, and insist on room for one’s own
interpretation, one’s own path in the construction of the self, even if that
construction is social and we need others to loosen ourselves from our
prejudice. We can try to use social networks to make new connections rather
than consolidate existing ones. We can resist the regimentation of ideology
embedded in institutions by bringing it to light, applying the x-ray of
analysis.
Against closed
groups or communities we can resist myopia, intolerance, nationalism,
chauvinism, and insist on their opening up, on outside connections, and on
turnover of membership. This applies to boards of directors and supervisors,
committees, organizations, positions, jobs, etc. Democracy is never perfect, is
often a myth, but it does yield turnover of power due to elections.
Against loss
of responsibility we can stop hiding the inability to exercise
responsibility as a result of system tragedy, unmask and demystify
managerial fables of control, accept that not all uncertainty can or should be
eliminated, leave room for error, and seek new forms of control. Here I refer
to item 75 in this blog, on horizontal control. The crux of that is that
those controlled help to inform the control over them, with the reward of less
control if they do so honestly.
Against
system tragedy due to complexity of social systems, we can reduce
complexity by decentralization, with a large degree of local autonomy, in
localized government and smaller, more independent organizations, collaborating
rather than concentrating in mergers or
acquisitions. This is a classic solution: decompose. Another solution is
to reduce strong ties, by reducing rules, untightening control. Here again I
refer to horizontal control.
On a deeper
level, underlying all this is the issue of universals that I discussed
repeatedly in this blog. We should surrender claims of closed, complete and
universal ideas and rules, applying everywhere and always, to recognize variety
and contingency of circumstance, and the flux involved in life and society, the
changes that cannot be foreseen and planned for. In short: imperfection
on the move.
No comments:
Post a Comment